Search legal guides

Search MJ Kotze Inc legal guides and articles

Moving assets in

Companies Holding Property in a Trust Structure: How It Is Taxed (South Africa) [2026]

How a property-owning company beneath a trust is taxed — and when putting property in a company makes sense.

Published Last reviewed 8 min read

Written by

Martin Kotze

Attorney, Conveyancer & Notary Public

Quick answer

Why put property in a company at all

In the classic structure, a newly formed private company (Newco) owns the property and the trust owns the shares in Newco. The company is the legal owner of the bricks and mortar; the trust holds the value through its shareholding; and the beneficiaries receive whatever the trustees decide to distribute. The reasons to interpose a company are practical — ring-fencing the property in its own legal entity, making it easy to bring in co-owners or future properties as a group, and keeping the asset one step further from the founder’s personal creditors.

But the company layer is not free. Whatever the company earns is taxed in the company first, and getting that money up to the trust (and ultimately to the family) is a second taxable event. Before you build it, weigh the company route against owning the property directly in the trust — see trust versus company for the head-to-head.

How the company is taxed: rent and capital gains

Rent received by Newco is ordinary income, taxed in Newco at the company rate of 27%. When Newco eventually sells the property, the capital gain is taxed in the company too — and here the rate matters a great deal. A company includes 80% of its capital gain in income and is taxed at 27%, giving an effective CGT rate of 21.6%.

Source — the actual words

25 February 2026 – No changes in percentages but changes to exclusions (see in bold below): Type 2027 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 Individuals and Special Trusts 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% Companies 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 21.6% 22.4% Other Trusts 36% 36% 36% 36% 36% 36%

Note — These are effective rates. The company figure of 21.6% is the legislated 80% inclusion applied to the 27% company income-tax rate (27% × 80% = 21.6%), following the 2023 reduction of the company rate from 28% to 27%; an older SARS guide still showing 22,4% predates that reduction.

SARS Capital Gains Tax rate table, SARS CGT rate table (updated 25 February 2026) — effective ratesRead it on SARS

The 21.6% is no accident of arithmetic — it is fixed by the Eighth Schedule, which sets the share of a capital gain that is brought into the income that is taxed. A company falls into the “in any other case” 80% bracket, the same inclusion rate a discretionary trust carries:

Source — the actual words

A person’s taxable capital gain for the year of assessment is— (a) in the case of a natural person or a special trust as defined in section 1 of the Act, 40 per cent; … (c) in any other case, 80 per cent, of that person’s net capital gain for that year of assessment.

Note — A natural person (and a special trust) includes only 40% of the gain; a company or an ordinary trust includes 80%. The effective rate is that inclusion rate multiplied by the taxpayer’s income-tax rate — 80% × 27% = 21.6% for a company, 80% × 45% = 36% for a trust.

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, Eighth Schedule, para 10(1) — inclusion rates (extract)Read it on gov.za

Two points decide whether this is a good or bad place to hold the asset. First, the company effective rate of 21.6% sits below the standard trust rate of 36%, so a company is a cheaper place to realise a gain than a discretionary trust. Second, and against that, a company gets no primary-residence exclusion: the R3 million exclusion that a natural person keeps on selling a home simply does not exist for a company. That single difference is why a home rarely belongs in a company.

The rates that drive the company-in-a-trust decision (2026)
TaxApplies toRate (2026)
Income tax — trustIncome retained in an ordinary trust45% (flat)
Income tax — companyNewco's rental / trading profit27%
Income tax — individualIncome vested in a resident beneficiaryUp to 45% (sliding scale)
CGT — trustGain retained in an ordinary trust (80% inclusion)36% effective
CGT — companyGain in a company (80% inclusion)21.6% effective
CGT — individual / special trustGain in a person / special trust (40% inclusion)18% effective
Dividends taxCompany pays a dividend upward20%
Donations taxGifts / s 7C deemed donations (25% over R30m cumulative)20%
Estate dutyDutiable estate on death (25% over R30m)20%
Securities transfer taxTransfer of shares (e.g. Newco shares to the trust)0.25%
VATStandard-rated supplies (e.g. commercial property by a vendor)15%
Official rate of interests 7C deemed donation on low/no-interest loans (repo 7% + 1%)8% (from 1 Jun 2026)
Transfer dutyAcquiring property — sliding scale0% to R1.21m … 13% above R13.31m

Last reviewed: 3 June 2026. Rates are South African and time-sensitive; 2026 Budget measures (donations-tax exemption increases, resident-spouse limitation) are subject to Parliament's legislative process. A special trust is taxed on the individual sliding scale (CGT 18%), not the flat 45% / 36% that applies to an ordinary trust. Confirm every figure against the current SARS material before acting.

Getting cash out: dividends versus returns of capital

The company pays its tax, but the profit is still trapped inside Newco. Moving it up to the trust is a separate, taxable step. When Newco passes profits up as a dividend, dividends tax of 20% is withheld. The conduit principle that lets a trust flow income through to beneficiaries does not switch dividends tax off — it is a separate, largely final tax on the distribution itself.

Source — the actual words

A dividend is in essence any payment by a company to a shareholder in respect of a share held in that company, excluding the return of contributed tax capital (i.e. consideration received by a company for the issue of shares). … The rate of Dividends Tax increased from 15% to 20% for any dividend paid on or after 22 February 2017 (irrespective of declaration date), unless an exemption or reduced rate is applicable.

Note — The 20% rate is set in section 64E of the Income Tax Act. It is a withholding tax on the shareholder (here, the trust), deducted by the company before the money is paid up. A return of contributed tax capital is carved out of the definition of a dividend, so it is not caught by this tax.

SARS Dividends Tax, SARS Dividends Tax — “What is Dividends Tax?” and “How much will be paid?” (extract)Read it on SARS

A return of contributed tax capital is treated differently. Paying back what was originally subscribed for the shares is not a dividend, so it is not subject to dividends tax — though it reduces the shareholder’s base cost in the shares. This is one reason the share capital and the loan account are set up carefully at the outset: a sensible mix leaves a route to extract value as a return of capital before dividends become the only way out.

The statute spells out both halves of that — the 20% charge, and the carve-out for contributed tax capital that keeps a genuine return of capital outside it:

Source — the actual words

“dividend” means any amount … transferred or applied by a company that is a resident … but does not include any amount so transferred or applied to the extent that the amount so transferred or applied— (i) results in a reduction of contributed tax capital of the company; … [64E.] (1)(a) … there must be levied … a tax, to be known as the dividends tax, calculated— (i) at the rate of 20 per cent … of the amount of any dividend paid by any company other than a headquarter company.

Note — Limb (i) of the “dividend” definition is the contributed-tax-capital carve-out; because dividends tax under s 64E is levied only on a dividend, a return of contributed tax capital falls outside the charge altogether.

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 1 “dividend” (carve-out) and s 64E(1)(a) — dividends tax (extract)Read it on gov.za

The residential-property-company trap on a later share sale

Founders sometimes assume that selling the company later (selling the shares) avoids property transfer duty, because no land changes hands. For a residential property, that is wrong. The law looks through the company: where more than half of a company’s assets are residential property, selling its shares is taxed as if you had bought the property itself.

This is not a SARS view of the law — it is the law itself. The Transfer Duty Act defines a “residential property company” on a more-than-50% test and, in the same breath, folds a share in such a company into the meaning of “property”, so that a transfer of the shares is taxed as a transfer of property:

Source — the actual words

“property” means land in the Republic and any fixtures thereon, and includes— … (d) a share (other than a share contemplated in paragraph (g)) or member’s interest in a residential property company; … “residential property company” means any company, other than a REIT as defined in section 1 of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (Act 58 of 1962), that holds property that constitutes— (a) residential property; or (b) a contingent right contemplated in paragraph (f) of the definition of “property”, and where the fair value of that property or contingent right comprises more than 50 per cent of the aggregate fair market value of all the assets … held by that company on the date of acquisition of an interest in that company;

Note — Bringing a share into the definition of “property” (para (d)) is the anti-avoidance mechanism: because transfer duty is levied on the acquisition of “property”, a sale of the shares in a residential property company attracts duty on the same sliding scale as a sale of the land. A share-block-company share (para (g)) is carved out.

Transfer Duty Act 40 of 1949, s 1 — definitions of “property” (para (d)) and “residential property company” (extract)Read it on gov.za

SARS’s own Transfer Duty Guide restates the definition and confirms the consequence in plain terms:

Source — the actual words

“residential property company” means any company, other than a REIT as defined in section 1 of the Income Tax Act, 1962 (Act No. 58 of 1962), that holds property that constitutes— (a) residential property; or (b) a contingent right contemplated in paragraph (f) of the definition of “property”, and where the fair value of that property or contingent right comprises more than 50 per cent of the aggregate fair market value of all the assets … held by that company … [The Guide explains:] The implication is that the supply of any shares or other interests in an entity falling within the scope of this definition is regarded as the supply of “property” which is subject to transfer duty.

SARS Transfer Duty Guide (Legal-Pub-Guide-TD01), Transfer Duty Guide (Issue 6), para 2.7 — “residential property company”Read it on SARSPDF

So a buyer of the shares in a Newco that mainly holds a home will pay transfer duty on the property’s value, on the same sliding scale that applies to buying the land outright. That can be a significant unbudgeted cost on exit. It does not mean a company is wrong — it means you must plan for it, and check whether a roll-over exemption is available. See the detail in transfer duty and the section 42 exemption.

Where the company holds commercial rather than residential property, that transfer-duty look-through does not apply — but a sale of the shares is still a transfer of a security, so securities transfer tax of 0,25% is levied on the value of the shares. (Forming Newco and issuing its first shares is an issue, not a transfer, so no STT arises on setup — STT only bites once existing shares change hands.)

Source — the actual words

There must be levied and paid for the benefit of the National Revenue Fund a tax, to be known as the securities transfer tax, in respect of every transfer of any security issued by— (a) a close corporation or company incorporated, established or formed inside the Republic; … at the rate of 0,25 per cent of the taxable amount of that security determined in terms of this Act.

Note — STT is triggered by a transfer of an existing security, not by the original issue of shares when Newco is formed. A transfer of shares under another section 42 transaction is exempt (s 8(1)(a)(i)); a plain sale of the shares is not.

Securities Transfer Tax Act 25 of 2007, STT Act, s 2(1) — imposition (extract)Read it on SARSPDF

When a property company makes sense — and when it does not

The honest position is that a property company beneath a trust earns its keep for some assets and quietly costs you money for others. It makes sense for a let or commercial property (where there was never a primary-residence exclusion to lose, the company’s 21.6% CGT beats the trust’s 36%, and the entity makes co-ownership and growth easy), and for building a group of properties that you will hold long-term and reorganise over time.

It does not make sense for your primary residence or a single long-held personal investment: you would surrender the R3 million exclusion and the 18% individual CGT rate, add a 20% dividend layer on the way out, and walk into the residential-property-company transfer-duty trap on a later share sale.

Frequently asked questions

  • It depends on what the property is. A company beneath a trust suits a let or commercial property, or a structure you intend to grow into a group. It rarely suits your own home: a company gets no primary-residence exclusion and pays CGT at an effective 21.6%, where you personally would keep the R3 million exclusion and an 18% effective rate. See whether to move it in.

  • Rent is taxed in the company at 27%. On a later sale the capital gain is taxed at an effective 21.6% (80% inclusion × 27%), with no primary-residence exclusion. Passing the profit up to the trust as a dividend then triggers a further 20% dividends tax. The combined company-then-dividend cost is the price of the structure.

  • No. A company does not avoid CGT — it changes the rate and removes a relief. It pays CGT at an effective 21.6% (lower than a trust at 36%) but loses the R3 million primary-residence exclusion a natural person keeps. For a home you would usually pay more, not less.

  • Two main routes. A dividend (profit up to the trust) carries 20% dividends tax. A return of contributed tax capital — paying back what was originally subscribed for the shares — is not a dividend and is not subject to dividends tax, but it reduces base cost. This is why the share capital and loan account are structured carefully at the outset.

  • Because the law looks through the company. Where its assets are more than 50% residential property, it is a “residential property company”, and selling its shares is taxed as if you bought the property itself. See the transfer-duty rules and budget for the duty.

For the businesses we act for

The Keystone Workspace

The attorney-designed platform the businesses we act for use to run their contracts, e-signatures and company secretarial work in one place.

Why you can trust this: Martin Kotze has been an admitted Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, registered Conveyancer, and Notary Public since 2014, practising from Pretoria. The firm is regulated by the Legal Practice Council under firm registration 17444.

This guide is general information, not legal advice for your specific matter.

Work with an attorney

Set up or restructure your trust correctly

Martin Kotze drafts trust deeds, registers trusts with the Master, and structures trust-and-company holdings end-to-end. General guidance on this page is not a substitute for advice on your facts.