Moving assets in

Corporate Roll-Over Relief: Sections 41–47 of the Income Tax Act (South Africa) [2026]

The whole roll-over toolkit — asset-for-share, amalgamation, intra-group, unbundling and liquidation relief.

Published Last reviewed 9 min read

Written by

Martin Kotze

Attorney, Conveyancer & Notary Public

Quick answer

The corporate roll-over reliefs in Part III of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 (sections 41 to 47) let assets and shares move between companies — and from a person into a company — with no immediate tax. They cover asset-for-share (s 42), amalgamation (s 44), intra-group (s 45), unbundling (s 46) and liquidation distribution (s 47). Each works by deferral: the receiving company inherits the original base cost, so the gain is taxed later, not forgiven, and the receiving company must be a South African resident.

The roll-over toolkit (sections 41 to 47)

Transferring an asset is normally a disposal, and a transfer to a connected company is treated as happening at full market value even if no money changes hands — which would crystallise the whole built-in gain at once. Part III of the Income Tax Act exists to remove that immediate charge when a genuine reorganisation takes place, by deferring the gain instead of forgiving it.

Part III contains six relief mechanisms. Only some are relevant to building a single family structure, but it helps to see the whole toolkit:

  • Section 42 — asset-for-share: a person swaps an asset for shares in a company. The main tool for moving a property into a Newco.
  • Section 43 — substitutive share-for-share: swapping one class of shares for another.
  • Section 44 — amalgamation / merger: combining companies later, once a group exists.
  • Section 45 — intra-group: moving assets between companies in the same group.
  • Section 46 — unbundling: distributing a subsidiary’s shares to shareholders to split a group apart.
  • Section 47 — liquidation distribution: winding a redundant company up into its holding company.

Section 42: the asset-for-share transaction

Section 42 lets a person hand an asset to a resident company and receive equity shares in return, with no immediate tax, provided the person ends up holding a qualifying interest in that company (for an unlisted company, at least 10% of the equity shares and voting rights). It is the entry tool for the classic trust-and-company structure: it puts a property into a Newco at its base cost, so the gain is deferred rather than triggered. Because it carries its own 18-month anti-avoidance traps and its own transfer-duty mechanics, it has its own dedicated page.

Read the deep treatment of the qualifying-interest test, the worked example and the 18-month clawbacks on the section 42 asset-for-share page.

Section 44: amalgamation (merging companies)

Section 44 is used to merge companies: one company (the amalgamated company) passes all its assets to another (the resultant company) and then ceases to exist. It is rarely needed when first building a family structure, but it matters once two or more companies sit beneath the trust and the family wants to combine them.

Source — the actual words

“amalgamation transaction” means any transaction— (a)(i) in terms of which any company … (the “amalgamated company”) which is a resident disposes of all of its assets … to another company … (the “resultant company”) which is a resident, by means of an amalgamation, conversion or merger; and (ii) as a result of which the existence of that amalgamated company will be terminated; …

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 44(1) — definition of "amalgamation transaction" (extract)Read it on gov.za

The relief defers the gain in the usual way: the resultant company steps into the amalgamated company’s base cost, so the built-in gain is carried over to the surviving company rather than taxed on the merger.

Section 45: intra-group transfers

Once there is a group of companies under the trust, section 45 lets assets move between those companies tax-neutrally. The defining feature is that both companies must form part of the same group of companies at the end of the day of the transaction, and the transferee company must be a South African resident.

Source — the actual words

“intra-group transaction” means any transaction— (a)(i) in terms of which any asset is disposed of by one company (the “transferor company”) to another company that is a resident (the “transferee company”) and both companies form part of the same group of companies as at the end of the day of that transaction …

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 45(1) — definition of "intra-group transaction" (extract)Read it on gov.za

Again the gain is deferred, not wiped out: the transferee company inherits the transferor company’s base cost. Section 45 is the tool for collapsing a redundant company’s assets into a sibling, or repositioning a property within an existing group, without a fresh tax charge.

Sections 46 and 47: unbundling and liquidation distributions

Section 46 — unbundling. Used to split a group apart: a parent company distributes the shares of a subsidiary to its own shareholders. The subsidiary is separated out without the distribution being taxed as a normal in-specie dividend, with the shareholders carrying over base cost into the unbundled shares. It is the opposite manoeuvre to an amalgamation — and is plain-language territory here because the supplied source material does not extract its defining provision.

Section 47 — liquidation distribution. Used to collapse a redundant company into its holding company on winding-up:

Source — the actual words

“liquidation distribution” means any transaction— (a) in terms of which any company (the “liquidating company”) which is a resident disposes of all of its assets … to its shareholders in anticipation of or in the course of the liquidation, winding up or deregistration of that company … to another company (the “holding company”) which is a resident and which on the date of that disposal forms part of the same group of companies …

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 47(1) — definition of "liquidation distribution" (extract)Read it on gov.za

The holding company takes over the liquidating company’s base cost, so the gain rolls over to the survivor rather than crystallising on the wind-up. This is how a family removes an empty or duplicate company from beneath the trust without paying tax simply for tidying up the structure.

The two features that run through them all

Whichever relief you reach for, the same two threads appear. First, each requires the receiving company (and usually the parties) to be a South African resident — the relief is built to keep value inside the SA tax net, not to ship it offshore tax-free. Second, each defers tax by deeming the parties to step into each other’s shoes on base cost: the receiving party inherits the original base cost, so the built-in gain travels with the asset and is taxed only when that party eventually disposes of it.

A practical bonus runs alongside the income-tax deferral: transfers made under the Part III roll-over rules are also exempt from securities transfer tax, so the share legs of an asset-for-share (s 42), amalgamation (s 44), intra-group (s 45), unbundling (s 46) or liquidation distribution (s 47) do not attract the usual 0.25% STT. See the VAT and securities transfer tax page for how that exemption fits with transfer duty and VAT. If your aim is to dispose of an operating business rather than reorganise around it, the analysis shifts toward selling the business on its own terms.

Frequently asked questions

  • They are the corporate reorganisation reliefs in Part III of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, sections 41 to 47. They let assets and shares move between connected companies, and from a person into a company, with no immediate tax — by deferring the gain, not forgiving it. The six tools are asset-for-share (s 42), share-for-share (s 43), amalgamation (s 44), intra-group (s 45), unbundling (s 46) and liquidation distribution (s 47).

  • It is the relief used to merge companies. One resident company — the amalgamated company — disposes of all of its assets to another resident company (the resultant company) by amalgamation, conversion or merger, and the amalgamated company then ceases to exist. The gain is deferred because the resultant company inherits the amalgamated company’s base cost.

  • It moves an asset tax-neutrally between two companies in the same group of companies as at the end of the day of the transaction, where the transferee company is a South African resident. It is how you shuffle assets between companies once a group already sits beneath the trust. The transferee inherits the transferor’s base cost, so the gain is deferred, not removed.

  • It is the relief used to collapse a redundant company into its holding company on winding-up. A resident liquidating company disposes of all of its assets to a resident holding company in the same group, in anticipation of or during its liquidation, winding up or deregistration. The holding company inherits the base cost, so the gain is deferred.

  • They delay it. Each relief in ss 41–47 defers the gain by making the parties step into each other’s shoes on base cost — the receiving party takes over the original base cost, so the built-in gain is taxed later when it eventually sells. They also require the receiving company (and usually the parties) to be South African resident. This is deferral, not forgiveness.

Sources

See the full Trusts source library for every Act, SARS guide and judgment cited across this hub.

Why you can trust this: Martin Kotze has been an admitted Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, registered Conveyancer, and Notary Public since 2014, practising from Pretoria. The firm is regulated by the Legal Practice Council under firm registration F17333.

This guide is general information, not legal advice for your specific matter.

Work with an attorney

Set up or restructure your trust correctly

Martin Kotze drafts trust deeds, registers trusts with the Master, and structures trust-and-company holdings end-to-end. General guidance on this page is not a substitute for advice on your facts.