Search legal guides

Search MJ Kotze Inc legal guides and articles

The trust-and-company structure

The Players & "Connected Persons" in a Trust-and-Company Structure [2026]

Founder, trustees, beneficiaries and Newco — and the connected-person web that switches on the anti-avoidance rules.

Published Last reviewed 7 min read

Written by

Martin Kotze

Attorney, Conveyancer & Notary Public

Quick answer

The cast of characters

The structure has three layers plus the people who benefit, and four roles drive everything that follows.

  • The founder (also called the donor or settlor) creates the trust and puts the first assets or funding in.
  • The trustees hold and manage the trust property for the beneficiaries. They owe strict duties and may only act once the Master of the High Court has issued letters of authority.
  • The beneficiaries are those who may benefit — typically the founder, a spouse, children and often later generations. In a discretionary trust they have only a hope of benefiting until the trustees exercise their discretion; in a vesting trust they already hold fixed rights.
  • The company (Newco) is an ordinary private company under the Companies Act 71 of 2008. The trust holds its shares and it holds the underlying asset — here, immovable property.

Most founders wear more than one hat: the same person is frequently the founder, a trustee and a beneficiary all at once. That overlap is exactly why the connected-person rules below catch the whole structure. We unpack each role in founder, trustee and beneficiary.

How widely SARS reads “beneficiary”

The word “beneficiary” carries a lot of weight in this area, because being a beneficiary is what makes a trust a connected person. SARS reads the term very widely — it is not confined to people who have already received something, and it captures contingent beneficiaries who may only benefit on some future event.

Source — the actual words

“beneficiary” in relation to a trust means a person who has a vested or contingent interest in all or a portion of the receipts or accruals or the assets of that trust;

Note — Interpretation Note 67 (Connected Persons) is now at Issue 4.

SARS Interpretation Note 67 — Connected Persons (Issue 4), Issue 4, s 3.1.4, quoting s 1(1) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962Read it on SARSPDF

Interpretation Note 67 then adopts the leading commentary on just how wide that definition runs — confirming that discretionary and age-contingent beneficiaries are already “beneficiaries”:

Source — the actual words

This definition thus includes both capital and income beneficiaries. It is considered that so-called ‘discretionary beneficiaries’, whose interests are dependent upon the decisions from time to time of the trustees, have contingent interests as contemplated in the definition and are therefore ‘beneficiaries’ as defined, irrespective of whether or not they have ever been in receipt of any distributions or have formally accepted benefits. … A contingent beneficiary whose rights are dependent upon reaching a specific age, will, it is submitted, also be a ‘beneficiary’ prior to that date, notwithstanding that the interest is entirely conditional upon survival to a future date;

Note — The words quoted are the commentary SARS expressly endorses (“SARS is in agreement with the authors’ comments”). Whether a particular person is a beneficiary “must always be a question of fact to be determined by examination of the trust deed”.

SARS Interpretation Note 67 — Connected Persons (Issue 4), Issue 4, s 3.1.4 (adopting D Clegg & R Stretch, Income Tax in South Africa)Read it on SARSPDF

The practical takeaway: a discretionary beneficiary who has received nothing, and even a child who will only benefit on turning 18, is already a beneficiary for tax purposes. Majority age is 18, but the connected-person link does not wait for it:

Source — the actual words

A child, whether male or female, becomes a major upon reaching the age of 18 years.

Children's Act 38 of 2005, s 17 (Age of majority)Read it on gov.za

The “connected person” definition

“Connected person” is the master switch. The Income Tax Act defines it in section 1(1) by working through each type of taxpayer — a natural person, a trust, and a company — and listing who is connected to each. The extracts that matter for a family structure are these:

Source — the actual words

“connected person” means— (a) in relation to a natural person— (i) any relative; and (ii) any trust … of which such natural person or such relative is a beneficiary; (b) in relation to a trust …— (i) any beneficiary of such trust; and (ii) any connected person in relation to such beneficiary; (bA) in relation to a connected person in relation to a trust …, any other person who is a connected person in relation to such trust; (d) in relation to a company— … (iv) any person … that … holds, directly or indirectly, at least 20 per cent of— (aa) the equity shares in the company; or (bb) the voting rights in the company; …

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 1(1) — definition of "connected person" (extracts)Read it on gov.za

Read those paragraphs together and the family structure folds in on itself: the founder is connected to the trust (because the founder benefits), the trust is connected to every beneficiary, and Newco is connected to whoever holds 20% of it — which is the trust. Everyone ends up connected to everyone.

A natural person’s “relatives” (paragraph (a)(i)) is itself a defined and wide term — it reaches a spouse and anyone related within the third degree, plus the spouses of those relatives:

Source — the actual words

“relative” in relation to any person, means the spouse of that person or anybody related to that person or that person’s spouse within the third degree of consanguinity, or any spouse of anybody so related, and for the purpose of determining the relationship between any child referred to in the definition of “child” in this section and any other person, that child shall be deemed to be related to the adoptive parent of that child within the first degree of consanguinity;

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 1(1) — definition of "relative"Read it on gov.za

The connected-person chain

It helps to trace the chain link by link, using the Nkosi family as the worked example.

Why “connected” matters

The connected-person label is not academic — it is the trigger for most of the anti-avoidance rules discussed across this guide. Once the parties are connected, the following all switch on.

  • Section 7C — an interest-free or low-interest loan to the connected trust creates an annual deemed donation.
  • Section 7 attribution — income or gains that reach a beneficiary by reason of the founder’s donation, settlement or other disposition can be taxed back in the founder’s hands.
  • Paragraph 38 of the Eighth Schedule — a transfer to a connected person for less than an arm’s-length price is deemed to happen at market value, so a built-in gain cannot be transferred away cheaply.
  • Donations tax — a sale to a connected person at undervalue is treated as a part-donation, bringing the 20% donations-tax charge into play.

Two of those rules are worth seeing in the Act’s own words, because they are what makes a connected-person transfer impossible to do cheaply. First, paragraph 38 of the Eighth Schedule deems a non-arm’s-length disposal to a connected person to happen at market value:

Source — the actual words

Subject to subparagraph (2) and section 9HB, where a person disposed of an asset by means of a donation or for a consideration not measurable in money or to a person who is a connected person immediately prior to or immediately after that disposal in relation to that person for a consideration which does not reflect an arm’s length price— (a) the person who disposed of that asset must be treated as having disposed of that asset for an amount received or accrued equal to the market value of that asset as at the date of that disposal; and (b) the person who acquired that asset must be treated as having acquired that asset at a cost equal to that market value, which cost must be treated as an amount of expenditure actually incurred for the purposes of paragraph 20(1)(a).

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, Eighth Schedule, para 38(1)(a)–(b)Read it on gov.za

Second, the same shortfall is independently treated as a donation under section 58 — which is what pulls donations tax into an undervalue sale:

Source — the actual words

Where any property has been disposed of for a consideration which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, is not an adequate consideration that property shall for the purposes of this Part be deemed to have been disposed of under a donation: Provided that in the determination of the value of such property a reduction shall be made of an amount equal to the value of the said consideration.

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 58(1)Read it on gov.za

Third, the section 7 attribution rules loop income arising from the founder’s funding of the structure back into the founder’s own hands:

Source — the actual words

If by reason of any donation, settlement or other disposition made, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, by any person (hereinafter referred to as the donor)— … any such rent, dividend, foreign dividend, interest, royalty or income … as is received by or accrues to or for the benefit of the said other person on or after 1 July 1983 and which would otherwise, but for the said donation, settlement or other disposition, have been received by or have accrued to or for the benefit of the donor, shall be deemed to have been received by or to have accrued to the donor.

Note — Section 7 has several attribution limbs; this is the general donor limb. A separate limb, s 7(3)–(4), loops a minor child’s income back to the funding parent.

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962, s 7(7)Read it on gov.za

Frequently asked questions

  • It is a defined term in section 1(1) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 that links people and entities too close to deal at arm’s length. For a natural person it includes any relative and any trust of which the person or a relative is a beneficiary; for a trust it includes every beneficiary; and for a company it includes anyone holding at least 20% of the equity shares or voting rights.

  • Almost always, yes. Under section 1(1), a trust is connected to a natural person if that person, or any relative, is a beneficiary of the trust. Because the founder is usually also a beneficiary — and so are the spouse and children — the founder, the trust and the beneficiaries are all connected to one another. See the founder, trustee and beneficiary roles.

  • The label switches on most of the anti-avoidance rules: section 7C on interest-free loans to the trust, the section 7 attribution rules, paragraph 38 of the Eighth Schedule (a non-arm’s-length transfer is deemed to happen at market value) and the donations-tax regime. Outside a connected relationship, several of these rules simply do not apply.

  • Yes. Section 7C is not limited to loans made directly to a trust. A low- or no-interest loan to a company in which the connected trust holds at least 20% of the equity shares or voting rights is also caught — so routing the loan through Newco instead of the trust does not avoid the deemed-donation charge.

  • Yes. A natural person’s relatives are connected persons under section 1(1). The Act defines a relative widely — a spouse and anyone related by blood or adoption within the third degree, plus the spouses of those relatives — so your spouse, children, parents and siblings are all connected persons to you.

Sources

See the full Trusts source library for every Act, SARS guide and judgment cited across this hub.

For the businesses we act for

The Keystone Workspace

The attorney-designed platform the businesses we act for use to run their contracts, e-signatures and company secretarial work in one place.

Why you can trust this: Martin Kotze has been an admitted Attorney of the High Court of South Africa, registered Conveyancer, and Notary Public since 2014, practising from Pretoria. The firm is regulated by the Legal Practice Council under firm registration 17444.

This guide is general information, not legal advice for your specific matter.

Work with an attorney

Set up or restructure your trust correctly

Martin Kotze drafts trust deeds, registers trusts with the Master, and structures trust-and-company holdings end-to-end. General guidance on this page is not a substitute for advice on your facts.