The 2026 headline rates — at a glance
South African corporate tax is administered by SARS (the South African Revenue Service) under the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. For a foreign group weighing up market entry, these are the numbers that matter. Figures last reviewed 16 July 2026.
| Tax | Rate | Effective date / scope |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate income tax (CIT) | 27% | Years of assessment ending on or after 31 March 2023; confirmed for years ending 1 April 2026 – 31 March 2027 |
| Branch of a foreign company | 27% | Same rate; no branch profits tax; remittances to head office tax-free (0%) |
| Dividends tax | 20% | Dividends paid on or after 22 February 2017; treaty-reducible |
| Withholding tax on interest | 15% | Interest paid on or after 1 March 2015; broad exemptions and treaty relief |
| Withholding tax on royalties | 15% | Royalties paid on or after 1 January 2015; treaty-reducible, often to 0% |
| Capital gains (companies) | 21.6% effective | 80% of the gain included in taxable income, taxed at 27% |
| Global minimum top-up | 15% | Groups with revenue of EUR 750m+; fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2024 |
The Budget tabled on 25 February 2026 changed none of these. It also withdrew the R20 billion in tax increases that had been provisionally pencilled in during 2025 — so the 2026 corporate tax landscape is stable, not tightening. SARS put it plainly:
The standard Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rate remains 27% for years of assessment ending 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2027. Budget 2026 announced no change.
Value-added tax sits at 15% — covered separately in VAT for foreign companies, whose registration rules can reach a foreign supplier with no South African presence at all.
Subsidiary vs branch: how each is taxed
A foreign investor operates in South Africa through one of two vehicles: a locally incorporated subsidiary (a private company, “(Pty) Ltd”) or a branch — the foreign company itself, registered with CIPC (the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission) as an external company. The tax arithmetic differs at the point profits leave the country:
- Subsidiary: pays 27% CIT on worldwide income, then 20% dividends tax when it distributes the after-tax balance to its foreign parent. Fully distributed, that is a combined 41.6% before treaty relief — with a typical 5% treaty rate it drops to a little over 30%.
- Branch: pays the same 27% on profits attributable to the South African operations, and remits the balance to head office with no further tax. The old branch-rate premium (33%, later 28%) is long gone, and dividends tax does not apply to branch remittances.
On pure rate arithmetic the branch often wins. In practice most foreign groups still choose the subsidiary for non-tax reasons — limited liability, commercial optics, banking, and scoring under B-BBEE (Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment). The full decision framework, including audit and exit costs, is in subsidiary or branch?
Getting money out: dividends, interest, royalties — and treaty relief
Dividends tax: 20%, reduced by treaty — if you file first
Dividends paid by a South African resident company to foreign shareholders attract dividends tax, withheld at source:
The rate of Dividends Tax increased from 15% to 20% for any dividend paid on or after 22 February 2017 (irrespective of declaration date), unless an exemption or reduced rate is applicable.
Here is the trap international groups fall into: treaty relief is not automatic. Under section 64G(3) of the Income Tax Act, the foreign beneficial owner must lodge the prescribed declaration and undertaking with the withholding agent before the dividend is paid. Miss that sequencing and the company must withhold the full 20%, leaving the shareholder to claim a refund from SARS — slow, paper-heavy, and entirely avoidable. Typical treaty rates for corporate shareholders:
| Treaty partner | Dividends rate | Qualifying condition |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5% (10% otherwise) | Company holding at least 10% of the capital |
| United States | 5% (15% otherwise) | Company holding directly at least 10% of the voting stock |
| Netherlands | 5% (10% otherwise) | Company holding at least 10% of the capital |
| Germany | 7.5% (15% otherwise) | Company owning directly at least 25% of the voting shares — the 1973 treaty still applies |
| Sweden | 5% | Company holding at least 10% of the capital (position since 2 October 2024) |
One warning about older advice: for a decade, Dutch and Swedish holding companies could reach 0% dividends tax through a most-favoured-nation (MFN) chain that borrowed the old SA–Kuwait treaty’s exclusive-residence dividend article. That route is dead: the protocol to the SA–Kuwait treaty entered into force on 2 October 2024 (Government Gazette 51637 of 22 November 2024), replacing 0% with 5%/10% and collapsing the MFN chain. Whether historic pre-protocol claims survive is contested — take advice before relying on any pre-2024 position.
Interest: 15%, with broad exemptions
The WTI is a tax charged on interest paid (on or after 1 March 2015) by any person to or for the benefit of a foreign person (which includes individuals, companies, etc.) from a source within South Africa. The foreign person is responsible for the tax, and it must be withheld by the person making the interest payment to or for the benefit of the foreign person. Interest paid is taxed at a final withholding tax rate of 15% where exemptions or reduced rate does not apply.
The exemptions in section 50D are wide enough that much cross-border interest escapes the net entirely: interest paid by the South African government or by banks, interest on listed debt, interest paid by headquarter companies on qualifying back-to-back funding, and interest on debt owed by one foreign person to another (within limits) are all exempt — the full list is in SARS Interpretation Note 115. On top of that, several major treaties (including the UK, Netherlands, US and Sweden) reduce interest withholding to 0%; Germany’s 1973 treaty allows 10%.
Royalties: 15% — and no tax on service fees
Royalties paid to non-residents attract a final 15% withholding (rate in force for royalties paid on or after 1 January 2015), routinely reduced — often to 0% — by treaty. Management and technical service fees carry no withholding tax at all: the proposed service-fee withholding was repealed with effect from 1 January 2017 without ever coming into force. Instead, cross-border service arrangements above R10 million where the non-resident’s people are physically present in South Africa must be disclosed to SARS as reportable arrangements — and, as the next section shows, that physical presence carries its own, bigger risk.
Every one of these outbound payments also crosses South Africa’s exchange-control perimeter — see exchange control for foreign investors for the authorised-dealer formalities that run alongside the tax rules.
Permanent establishment: when trading with South Africa becomes taxable in South Africa
A foreign company that merely sells into South Africa — exports, cross-border licensing, remote services — is taxable here only on income from a South African source. Where a double taxation agreement (DTA) applies, the shield is stronger still: business profits may be taxed in South Africa only if the company has a permanent establishment (PE) here, and then only the profits attributable to that PE. Registering as an external company with CIPC is a company-law obligation triggered by “conducting business” — it does not itself create a PE, and the two tests are applied independently.
The classic PE triggers are a fixed place of business (an office, workshop or site), a dependent agent who habitually concludes contracts here — and, less intuitively, people. South Africa’s Tax Court has held that consultants working for months from a client’s boardroom created a services PE:
Treaties cut both ways, though — where a DTA allocates taxing rights away from South Africa, it prevails over domestic charging provisions:
A modern overlay: the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument (MLI) has applied to South Africa’s covered treaties since 1 January 2023, adding a principal-purpose test and tighter agency-PE rules (South Africa listed 76 treaties; per SARS, 50 partners have ratified). The US and German treaties are not covered, so those older texts apply unmodified — check the OECD matching database for your treaty before structuring.
Funding the South African company: three constraints in one loan
Most foreign parents fund their South African subsidiary with a mix of equity and shareholder loans. Three regimes hit the loan simultaneously — price the funding around all of them before signing:
- Transfer pricing (section 31). Cross-border connected-party terms must be arm’s length — both the interest rate and the quantum of debt. Any excess benefit is added back to taxable income, and the secondary adjustment treats the excess as a deemed dividend in specie taxed at 20% — with no treaty relief, on SARS’s view in Interpretation Note 127, because a deemed dividend has no beneficial owner. Documentation: a master file and local file become mandatory once aggregate cross-border connected-party transactions exceed R100 million for the year; country-by-country reporting starts at R10 billion consolidated group revenue.
- Interest-deduction cap (section 23M). Interest owed to a non-resident connected/controlling creditor that is not subject to South African tax on it is deductible only up to 30% of adjusted taxable income (years of assessment ending on or after 31 March 2023); the excess carries forward.
- Interest withholding. The 15% withholding tax applies to the interest actually paid, subject to the exemptions and treaty reductions above.
A fourth constraint operates at the level of losses: a company’s brought-forward assessed loss can shelter only the higher of R1 million or 80% of taxable income in any year — the balance carries forward, and once taxable income exceeds the R1 million floor, the unsheltered slice is taxed even while losses remain. Advance pricing agreements are not yet practically available — SARS’s bilateral-only pilot is still at draft stage (April 2026) and restricted to very large taxpayers. A dedicated transfer-pricing deep-dive is coming to this hub.
The sweeteners: SEZs, headquarter companies, R&D and the ETI
Four regimes can materially cut the effective rate for the right business model:
- Special Economic Zones (SEZs) — 15% CIT. Qualifying companies in the six zones approved by the Minister of Finance (Coega, Dube TradePort, East London, Maluti-a-Phofung, Richards Bay and Saldanha Bay — see InvestSA) pay 15% instead of 27%, plus an accelerated building allowance. The incentive sunsets for years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2031.
- Headquarter companies (section 9I). An elective regime for using South Africa as a holding platform for African operations: no dividends tax on the headquarter company’s own distributions, withholding-tax relief and transfer-pricing carve-outs on back-to-back funding — but strict 10%-per-shareholder, 80%-asset and 50%-income tests.
- R&D super-deduction (section 11D). A 150% deduction for approved scientific and technological R&D performed in South Africa, extended to 31 December 2033 — pre-approval by the Department of Science, Technology and Innovation is required (SARS R&D incentive page).
- Employment Tax Incentive (ETI). A monthly credit against payroll tax for young, lower-paid hires — per SARS’s published values from 1 April 2025, up to R1,500 per month in the first twelve months and R750 in the second twelve, for employees earning under R7,500 per month, with the incentive running to 28 February 2029. SARS notes the 1 April 2025 values apply for twelve months pending Parliament passing the enabling legislation — check the current values before modelling. Hiring rules more broadly are covered in employment law essentials.
The SEZ rules are also being reworked. The 2026 Budget Review proposes replacing the rigid connected-party disqualification with an arm’s-length pricing test — a proposal, not yet law:
Qualifying companies located in special economic zones approved by the Minister of Finance are taxed at a corporate tax rate of 15 per cent instead of 27 per cent. To prevent companies from shifting profits to connected firms in a special economic zone simply to take advantage of a lower tax rate, companies are disqualified if more than one-fifth of expenditure or gross income arises from transactions with connected firms outside the zone. These rigid rules work against businesses already operating in the zones, as well as against potential investors wanting to use the zones to strengthen their own supply chains. Government proposes a different approach. It will assess whether companies are buying or selling their products to connected parties outside the zone at market-related prices to ensure that profits are not shifted into the low-tax zone.
The 15% global minimum tax is live in South Africa
South Africa has implemented the OECD’s Pillar Two. The Global Minimum Tax Act 46 of 2024 (with its companion Administration Act 47 of 2024) imposes an income inclusion rule (IIR) and a domestic minimum top-up tax at a 15% effective-rate floor on multinational groups with consolidated revenue of EUR 750 million or more in at least two of the preceding tax years. The Acts were signed in December 2024 and January 2025 but apply retroactively to fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2024. South Africa has not enacted the under-taxed profits rule (UTPR).
Two practical consequences for inbound groups above the threshold. First, incentive-driven low effective rates — the 15% SEZ rate, heavy R&D deductions — can be clawed back to 15% by the domestic top-up, so model incentives net of Pillar Two. Second, the rules are still moving: the 2026 Budget confirms the updated OECD rules arrive in 2026/27.
In 2026/27, government will implement the updated global minimum tax rules. The rules are expected to reduce profit shifting by multinational corporations by reducing opportunities to take advantage of negligible or zero tax rates in other countries. Using the most recent data on companies' operations, and taking into account the OECD's updated rules following negotiations between member states, tax revenues of R2 billion are estimated as a result of this reform in 2026/27. This compares to the previous estimate of R8 billion.
The compliance calendar
Every South African company — including a registered external company — is a provisional taxpayer. The annual cycle, all run through SARS eFiling, looks like this:
- Registration is automatic: CIPC feeds new companies (and external companies) straight to SARS, which issues an income tax number via the CIPC–SARS interface. You must, however, appoint a public officer — a senior official resident in South Africa (section 246 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011) — see resident directors and the public officer.
- Provisional tax (IRP6): a first estimate and payment six months into the year of assessment, a second by year-end, and an optional third top-up about six months later to stop interest running.
- Annual return (ITR14): due within 12 months of financial year-end, with financial statements attached. Late filing triggers recurring monthly administrative penalties that scale with taxable income.
- Event-driven filings: dividends-tax returns when you distribute, and transfer-pricing master/local files within 12 months of year-end once past the R100 million threshold.
The wider registration stack — PAYE, UIF, SDL, VAT and customs, each with its own deadline — is mapped in tax and employer registrations after incorporation. And plan around the real bottleneck: tax numbers are near-instant, but opening the bank account (with verification of foreign beneficial owners under FICA, the Financial Intelligence Centre Act) is routinely the long pole in go-live.
Frequently asked questions
The corporate income tax rate is 27%, and SARS has confirmed 27% for years of assessment ending between 1 April 2026 and 31 March 2027. The Budget tabled on 25 February 2026 announced no change. A South African branch of a foreign company pays the same 27%. Capital gains are taxed at an effective 21.6% (80% of the gain is included in taxable income at 27%).
No. South African tax residents are taxed on worldwide income, but a non-resident company is taxed only on income from a South African source. Where a double taxation agreement applies, South Africa may tax the foreign company’s business profits only if it has a permanent establishment here, and then only the profits attributable to that permanent establishment. A South African subsidiary, by contrast, is itself a tax resident and is taxed on its worldwide income.
Treaty rates are not automatic. The foreign beneficial owner must give the company (or regulated intermediary) paying the dividend the prescribed declaration and undertaking under section 64G(3) of the Income Tax Act before the dividend is paid. If the forms are not in place, the full 20% is withheld and you are into refund territory. Typical treaty rates for corporate shareholders: UK, US and Netherlands 5% (holding of at least 10%), Germany 7.5% (at least 25% of voting shares, under the 1973 treaty).
No. A registered external company (branch) pays corporate income tax at 27% on profits attributable to its South African operations, and remitting those after-tax profits to head office attracts no further tax. Dividends tax applies to dividends paid by South African resident companies (and foreign companies listed on a South African exchange) — a branch remittance is neither, so the effective branch remittance tax is 0%. See subsidiary vs branch for the full comparison.
Only if your group’s consolidated revenue is EUR 750 million or more in at least two of the preceding tax years. South Africa’s Global Minimum Tax Act 46 of 2024 imposes an income inclusion rule and a domestic minimum top-up tax at a 15% effective-rate floor for fiscal years beginning on or after 1 January 2024 (the Act was signed in December 2024 with retroactive effect). South Africa has not enacted the under-taxed profits rule (UTPR).
No. South Africa’s proposed withholding tax on service fees was repealed with effect from 1 January 2017 without ever coming into force. But three things still bite: cross-border service arrangements over R10 million where your people are physically present in South Africa must be reported to SARS as reportable arrangements; the fees remain subject to transfer-pricing scrutiny; and sustained physical presence can create a services permanent establishment (as in AB LLC v CSARS), pulling the fees into the 27% corporate tax net.